Content

Material risks

Technical risks in non-life reinsurance

Risks emanating from non-life reinsurance are of crucial significance to our business operations. We make a fundamental distinction here between risks that result from business operations of past years (reserving risk) and those stemming from activities in the current or future years (price/premium risk). The catastrophe risk is especially important in the latter case.

Catastrophe losses and major claims
in EUR million
2009 gross 2009 net
Bushfire in Victoria/Australia, 5-17 February 38.2 34.7
Winter storm "Klaus" in France and Spain,
23-25 January
34.9 33.8
Airbus crash, Atlantic Ocean, 1 June 56.8 33.8
Damage to an oil drilling platform in Australia,
20 August
19.4 16.9
Flooding in Manila/Philippines, 21-28 September 16.9 16.9
Flooding in Central and Eastern Europe, 22-25 June 15.3 14.8
Explosion at a hydroelectric plant in Russia, 17 August 11.9 11.9
Earthquake in L'Aquila/Italy, 6 April 11.3 11.2
Collapse of City Archive, Cologne, 3 March 23.7 10.8
Hailstorm in Central and Eastern Europe, 23/24 July 10.2 9.1
Satellite failure, 11 April 8.9 8.6
Aviation claim in Clarence/US, 12 February 12.4 8.4
Satellite failure, 22 January 7.6 7.5
Aviation claim in Yemen, 30 June 7.0 6.4
Flooding in UK and Ireland, 18-20 November 5.9 5.4
Marine claim in Viareggio/Italy, 29 June 5.0 5.0
Hailstorm in Alberta/Canada, 1-3 August 5.1 4.5
Total 290.5 239.8

Limits for the 100- and 250-year aggregate annual loss as well as utilisation thereof
Natural catastrophes and aggregate annual loss in EUR million Limit 2009 Actual utilisation (July 2009)
All natural catastrophe risks, net exposure    
100-year aggregate annual loss 958.0 91%
250-year aggregate annual loss 1,245.4 88%

A significant technical risk is the reserving risk, i.e. the risk of under-reserving losses and the associated strain on the underwriting result. In order to counter this risk we calculate our loss reserves on an actuarial basis, where necessary supplemented by additional reserves based on our own actuarial loss estimations and the IBNR (incurred but not reported) reserve for losses that have already occurred but have not yet been reported to us.

Liability claims are a key influencing factor for the IBNR reserve. The IBNR reserve is calculated on a differentiated basis according to risk categories and regions. The IBNR reserve established by the Hannover Re Group amounted to EUR 3,537.8 million in the year under review. Especially with respect to asbestos- and pollutionrelated claims, the calculation methods are complex. The adequacy of these reserves can be estimated using the so-called “survival ratio”. This ratio expresses how many years the reserves would cover if the average level of paid claims over the past three years were to continue. At the end of the year under review our survival ratio stood at 24.3 years.

The statistical run-off triangles used by our company are another monitoring tool. They show how the reserve has changed over time as a consequence of paid claims and the recalculation of the reserves that are to be established as at each balance sheet date. Their adequacy is monitored using actuarial methods (cf. here Section 6.7 Technical provisions“). Our own actuarial calculations regarding the adequacy of the reserves are subject to annual quality assurance reviews conducted redundantly by external actuaries and auditors.

enlarge zoom

Reserves for asbestos-related claims and pollution damage
  2009 2008
Reserves in EUR million Individual loss reserves IBNR reserves Survival ratio in years Individual loss reserves IBNR reserves Survival ratio in years
Asbestos-related claims/ pollution damage 26.2 171.4 24.3 23.0 127.2 25.0
Reserves for asbestos-related claims and pollution damage
  2009 2008
Reserves in EUR million Individual loss reserves IBNR reserves Survival ratio in years Individual loss reserves IBNR reserves Survival ratio in years
Asbestos-related claims/ pollution damage 26.2 171.4 24.3 23.0 127.2 25.0

enlarge zoom

Combined and catastrophe loss ratio over the past ten years
in % 2009 2008 2007 2006 20051 20041 20031, 2 20021, 2 20011, 2 20001, 2
1 Including financial reinsurance and specialty insurance
2 Based on figures reported in accordance with US GAAP
3 Natural catastrophes and other man-made major losses > EUR 5 million gross for the share of the Hannover Re Group as a percentage of net premium earned
Combined ratio (non-life reinsurance) 96.6 95.4 99.7 100.8 112.8 97.2 96.0 96.3 116.5 107.8
Thereof catastrophe losses3 4.6 10.7 6.3 2.3 26.3 8.3 1.5 5.2 23.0 3.7
Combined and catastrophe loss ratio over the past ten years
in % 2009 2008 2007 2006 20051 20041 20031, 2 20021, 2 20011, 2 20001, 2
1 Including financial reinsurance and specialty insurance
2 Based on figures reported in accordance with US GAAP
3 Natural catastrophes and other man-made major losses > EUR 5 million gross for the share of the Hannover Re Group as a percentage of net premium earned
Combined ratio (non-life reinsurance) 96.6 95.4 99.7 100.8 112.8 97.2 96.0 96.3 116.5 107.8
Thereof catastrophe losses3 4.6 10.7 6.3 2.3 26.3 8.3 1.5 5.2 23.0 3.7

Stress tests for natural catastrophes after retrocessions in EUR million 2009 2008
  Effect on forecast net income
100-year loss European windstorm (114.7) (203.3)
100-year loss US windstorm (281.8) (279.4)
100-year loss Japanese windstorm (204.3) (97.7)
100-year loss Tokyo earthquake (201.4) (217.6)
100-year loss California earthquake (244.9) (260.2)
100-year loss Sydney earthquake (150.6) (107.3)

Licensed scientific simulation models, supplemented by the expertise of our own specialist departments, are used to assess our material catastrophe risks from natural hazards (earthquake, windstorm). Furthermore, we establish the risk to our portfolio from various scenarios (e.g. hurricanes in the US, windstorms in Europe, earthquakes in the US) in the form of probability distributions. The monitoring of the natural hazards exposure of the Hannover Re portfolio (accumulation control) is rounded out by the progressive inclusion of realistic extreme loss scenarios. Within the scope of accumulation controlling of these risks the Executive Board defines the appetite for assuming natural hazards risks once a year on the basis of the risk strategy. The risk appetite is a key basis for our underwriting approach in this segment. For the purposes of risk limitation, maximum underwriting limits (capacities) are stipulated for various extreme loss scenarios and return periods in light of profitability criteria. Adherence to these limits is continuously verified by the central risk monitoring function. The Risk Committee, the Executive Board and the body responsible for steering non-life reinsurance are kept regularly updated on the degree of capacity utilisation.

As part of our holistic approach to risk management across business groups, we take into account numerous relevant scenarios and extreme scenarios, determine their effect on key balance sheet variables and performance indicators, evaluate them in relation to the planned figures and identify alternative courses of action.

The price/premium risk lies in the risk of incomplete or inaccurate estimation of future claims, especially over time. Regular and independent reviews of the models used for treaty quotation as well as the implemented practices, e.g. our compulsory central and local underwriting guidelines, are vital management components. In addition, Hannover Re's treaty departments prepare regular reports on the progress of the various treaty renewals. The reporting in this regard makes reference inter alia to significant changes in conditions, risks (such as inadequate premiums) as well as to emerging market opportunities and the strategy pursued in order to accomplish targets.

Topic Navigation

Build your own individual report according to the topics you are interested in. Choose the topics which are essential for you.







 
show all

My Annual Report

Your page has been added successfully

Link für Popup